🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.